2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 2002 Seat Alhambra

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Alhambra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Alhambra would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Alhambra. (214 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Alhambra. 2002 Seat Alhambra has automatic transmission and 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK has manual transmission. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Seat Alhambra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercedes-Benz CK 2002 Seat Alhambra
Make Mercedes-Benz Seat
Model CK Alhambra
Year Released 2006 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3500 cc 1781 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 148 HP
Torque 522 Nm 214 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 1800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4090 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2830 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 55 L