2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 2010 BMW M5
To start off, 2010 BMW M5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW M5. (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW M5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 2010 BMW M5 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | BMW |
Model | CK | M5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 519 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2888 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |