2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CK | GT-R |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 485 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 588 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |