2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK would be higher. Both 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK and 2010 Nissan Murano are equipped with a 3,500 cc engine.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Murano. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | CK | Murano |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
