2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | CK | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2703 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |