2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
Model | CLK | Fronte |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 33 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2060 mm |