2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 835 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | CLK | 850 K |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2010 mm |