2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota ES 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota ES 3 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1124 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | CLK | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2320 mm |
