2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 168 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (461 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | CLK | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 87 L |