2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | CLK | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |