2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 4,966 cc, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP) has 295 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | CLK | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1400 cc |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2490 mm |