2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 4,966 cc, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (257 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 300 kg more than 2008 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | CLK | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 4601 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 257 HP |
Torque | 460 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |