2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2012 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2012 Renault Latitude is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2012 Renault Latitude | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | CLK | Latitude |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4897 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1832 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2760 mm |
