2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1961 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Triumph TR3 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 406 more horse power than 1961 Triumph TR3. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1961 Triumph TR3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Triumph TR3. (172 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Triumph TR3. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1961 Triumph TR3 has manual transmission. 1961 Triumph TR3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1961 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | CLS | TR3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 101 HP |
| Torque | 630 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 53 L |
