2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 443 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 534 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications: