2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (221 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Monteverdi |
Model | CLS | Sahara |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 246 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2550 mm |