2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 432 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (117 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CLS | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 630 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
