2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 409 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Baleno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 497 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (133 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1996 Suzuki Baleno has manual transmission. 1996 Suzuki Baleno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: