2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 391 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | CLS | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 66 L |