2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 2000 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Cougar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 384 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (176 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 2000 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
| Model | CLS | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 630 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
