2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 2005 Rover 45
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 45 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 407 more horse power than 2005 Rover 45. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 45.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 45. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 45. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2005 Rover 45 has manual transmission. 2005 Rover 45 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 2005 Rover 45 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | CLS | 45 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |