2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 250 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (257 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (245 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
| Model | CLS | 75 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 257 HP |
| Torque | 630 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
