2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 439 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Stilo. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2010 Fiat Stilo has manual transmission. 2010 Fiat Stilo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Fiat |
Model | CLS | Stilo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 58 L |