2006 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E (701 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercedes-Benz E 2011 Toyota Matrix
Make Mercedes-Benz Toyota
Model E Matrix
Year Released 2006 2011
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5441 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 469 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 701 Nm 219 Nm
Torque RPM 2650 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1549 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2601 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.2 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 50 L