2006 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 965 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz E (500 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz E | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Smart |
Model | E | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.4 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 33 L |