2006 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | ML | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4965 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 75 L |
