2006 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (440 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | ML | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 4965 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2160 mm |