2006 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML. (187 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 315 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (440 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (383 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | ML | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 383 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 87 L |