2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito (120 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | Vito | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 2151 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 1800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2850 mm |
