2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito vs. 1978 Zastava 132
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,151 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito (120 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132.
Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito | 1978 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | Vito | 132 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 2151 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 1800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2560 mm |