2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,151 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito. (120 HP @ 1800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | Vito | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2151 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 1800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2510 mm |