2006 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis (373 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Grand Marquis | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Mercury | Audi |
Model | Grand Marquis | TT |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |