2006 Mercury Mariner vs. 2000 Opel Omega

To start off, 2006 Mercury Mariner is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (133 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 615 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.

Because 2006 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercury Mariner 2000 Opel Omega
Make Mercury Opel
Model Mariner Omega
Year Released 2006 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 5666 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 133 HP 305 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 450 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1925 kg 1310 kg
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 52 L