2006 Mercury Mariner vs. 2012 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (133 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 128 kg more than 2012 Dodge Charger.

Because 2006 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercury Mariner 2012 Dodge Charger
Make Mercury Dodge
Model Mariner Charger
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 133 HP 292 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 352 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline / Electric Hybrid Flex Fuel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1925 kg 1797 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 5077 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1905 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 3053 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.1 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 7.1 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]