2006 Mercury Mariner vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Mariner (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (146 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 711 kg more than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercury Mariner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Mariner (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (197 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercury Mariner 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Mercury Mitsubishi
Model Mariner Lancer
Year Released 2006 2013
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2299 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 16 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 146 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 206 Nm 197 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10:01:00
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2011 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2635 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.8 L/100km 5.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 8.4 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]