2006 Mercury Mariner vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 234 kg more than 2006 Mercury Mariner.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (377 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Mariner | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mercury | Toyota |
Model | Mariner | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 168 Nm | 377 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 2159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.1 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 87 L |