2006 Mercury Milan vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Milan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Milan would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Milan. (221 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Milan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 83 kg more than 2006 Mercury Milan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Mercury Milan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Milan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Milan. (278 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Milan.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercury Milan 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Mercury Cadillac
Model Milan CTS-V
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2982 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 221 HP 556 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 278 Nm 746 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3800 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1832 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.1 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 16.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 68 L