2006 Mercury Milan vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Milan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Milan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Milan. (160 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Milan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 51 kg more than 2006 Mercury Milan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Milan. (213 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Milan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Milan | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Mercury | Dodge |
Model | Milan | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2278 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1832 kg | 1883 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 72 L |