2006 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (293 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Expedition (494 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (407 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Mountaineer | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Mountaineer | Expedition |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 293 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 106 L |