2006 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2010 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2010 GMC Acadia is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (293 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 GMC Acadia. (288 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2010 GMC Acadia.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (407 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 GMC Acadia. (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 GMC Acadia.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Mountaineer | 2010 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Mercury | GMC |
Model | Mountaineer | Acadia |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 293 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1986 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 83 L |