2006 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2011 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2011 Mercury Milan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 234 kg more than 2011 Mercury Milan.
Because 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mercury Milan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Mountaineer | 2011 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Mercury | Mercury |
Model | Mountaineer | Milan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 64 L |