2006 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2012 BMW 320

To start off, 2012 BMW 320 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2012 BMW 320. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 320.

Because 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercury Mountaineer 2012 BMW 320
Make Mercury BMW
Model Mountaineer 320
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 344 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 3700 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 84 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4624 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1811 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1384 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 57 L