2006 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (288 Nm). This means 2006 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercury Mountaineer | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Mercury | Chevrolet |
Model | Mountaineer | Captiva |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 288 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 65 L |