2006 MG TF vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG TF (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 150 kg more than 2006 MG TF.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 MG TF | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | MG | Nissan |
| Model | TF | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |
