2006 MG TF vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (159 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 100 kg more than 2006 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (220 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG TF | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | TF | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |