2006 MG TF vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG TF would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF.
Because 2006 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 MG TF | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | MG | Peugeot |
| Model | TF | 207 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 121 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |
