2006 MG ZR vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 2006 MG ZR is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZR weights approximately 215 kg more than 1950 Simca 8.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG ZR | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | MG | Simca |
Model | ZR | 8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2430 mm |