2006 MG ZR vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 MG ZR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZR (102 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZR weights approximately 155 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG ZR (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 MG ZR | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | MG | Renault |
| Model | ZR | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 77 mm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |
