2006 MG ZR vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2006 MG ZR and 2006 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZR (159 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZR. (174 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZR. 2006 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2006 MG ZR has manual transmission. 2006 MG ZR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG ZR | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | MG | Holden |
Model | ZR | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |