2006 MG ZR vs. 2010 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG ZR would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2006 MG ZR. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2006 MG ZR.

Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZR. (123 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZR. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2006 MG ZR has manual transmission. 2006 MG ZR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: